But there are a lot of unasked questions when you start a blog. At least, if you began a blog impulsively- as I have done- you probably didn't ask yourself some deep questions, such as: "what in the world am I going to write about?" "What unique thoughts do I have to offer the blogosphere?"
Honesty- naked honesty- seems to be in short supply these days (if, to be told, it ever was en vogue). Would simply "being real" generate traffic? Unlikely, if the subject matter isn't equally stimulating; after all, nobody cares about how I carefully sift through my Lucky Charms to separate the cereal from the marshmallows. But few people, I think, are really honest about deeper things: struggles they're going through (have you noticed how few people ever seem to need help?), shame or guilt, character flaws. As socially conscious people, I think we tend to hide or cover up anything others might consider unattractive; the Italians call it bella figura, but it's likely your mother drilled it into your brain by reminding you to "put your best foot forward". The underlying message, I think, would be clear: 'always smile; don't ever let on that something's wrong.'
I see this all the time in church. When people greet each other, you can count on most interactions playing out similar to the following: 'hi; how are you?' 'I'm great; how about yourself?' 'I'm great, too, thanks.' 'Great.' It's as if nothing can be wrong unless we want others to think we're less-than-perfect Christians.
Now herein lies the hypocrisy: I do that. Even if I'm lying through my teeth
I digress. I'm dishonest. I'm dishonest because I'm afraid of the backlash, of judgment. Adding another layer to our hypocrisy parfait, I am incredibly judgmental; why? I'm not sure. Maybe I'm judgmental because I was taught that 'God doesn't want us to do these things because they're bad.' But my little brain took it further: if people are defined by their actions, then it made sense to reason that people who did bad things were, themselves, bad. It's not hard to see how that kind of thought process, combined with a crippling insecurity and a shaky sense of self-worth, fosters a smug sense of superiority. I could justify looking down my nose at people who just weren't as good as me.
I got two wake-up calls in two very different manners. First of all, I found out certain people did certain things. (Honesty will be somewhat suspended when the information is not mine to share.) I remember actually being shocked; how naive. My thought process may have sounded a little like this: 'What?? But- but I thought that person was good!! There's no way they could have done that!! They can't be bad! I know they're good!' I couldn't reconcile the information I had with my perception of the person. How ridiculous is that? My second slap from reality was when I started realizing all my glaringly obvious flaws, sins, and mistakes. A good person- ME!- did something bad! I was currently doing something bad- or, at the very least, I wasn't being truly righteous! Was I still a good person? I didn't know. But what I do know is that it isn't my place to label people as "good" or "bad".
I suppose the gist of this post was to expose something I have been grappling with in the past few years.
that took a lot of balls... but i do agree with you in so many ways. sometimes we become so wound up on what we do that makes us look, in our perspective, better than everyone else.... that we forget that we're probably just as guilty and not as righteous as everyone else... not bad annie
ReplyDelete